The Historicity of the Resurrection #3
The Historicity of the Resurrection — Paul himself calls this the linchpin of the faith (1 Corinthians 15:14).
Paul stakes everything on this one event: “if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile” (1 Corinthians 15:14). Unlike most religious claims, which rest on private revelation or philosophical argument, Christianity roots itself in a public, falsifiable historical claim — that a specific man died and rose bodily on a specific weekend in first-century Jerusalem.
The Argument
Apologists typically build the case around a set of facts accepted by the large majority of scholars across the ideological spectrum, believer and skeptic alike: Jesus died by crucifixion, his tomb was found empty, multiple individuals and groups reported experiences they believed were appearances of the risen Jesus, and the disciples were transformed from a scattered, fearful group into people willing to suffer and die proclaiming the resurrection. Paul’s list of witnesses in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, written within about 20-25 years of the event and widely regarded as incorporating an even earlier creed, is treated as especially strong evidence because it names people (including 500 at once) who could still be questioned. The competing naturalistic explanations — that the disciples stole the body (Matthew 28:11-15 already records this rumor being circulated), that they hallucinated, or that Jesus merely swooned — are each argued to face serious historical difficulties in explaining the full set of facts together.
Common Objections
The most serious skeptical response is not any single alternative theory but a prior philosophical commitment: if miracles are ruled out in principle, no historical evidence could ever establish a resurrection, however strong. This is less a historical argument than a metaphysical one, and it is why the resurrection debate frequently turns into a debate about the possibility of miracles generally. Others argue the appearance accounts differ in detail across the gospels, though scholars note such variation is typical of independent eyewitness testimony rather than a sign of fabrication.
Key References
- 1 Corinthians 15:3-8
- 1 Corinthians 15:14
- Luke 24:1-12
- Matthew 28:11-15